Sneaky Flies and Ginkgo Leaves: The Story of Plant Mimesis in Fossil Insects.
Hello All,
Sorry it’s been
a bit long since the last post here; the past month or so has been hectic and
thus, I have not had time to finish writing the next post in the Carnivorous PlantDiversity and Evolution series. I’ve also hit a couple of problems with the
next post, but while it’s not out yet, rest assure that I haven’t forgotten it,
and you will get your carnivorous plant fix within the next month or so. But
for the moment, I thought you might be interested to read about a topic which I
find truly fascinating, and is certainly worthy of more attention: the
incredible phenomena of plant mimesis in fossilised insects!
It is well known
that within modern animals, the use of camouflage, or crypsis, is widespread.
This can take many forms and can range from the disruptive colouration of the
tiger, to the superb mimicry displayed by insects. It is this latter form of
crypsis which I will be focusing on in this blog post. This form of crypsis,
where the animal mimics an inanimate object, is known as mimesis. This
astounding ability is well known in modern insects, with the stick insects (various
genera within Phasmatodea) and the Deadleaf Butterfly (Kallima inachus) being particularly famous examples. However,
mimesis is by no means restricted to modern insects, but is also known from the
fossil record. The earliest example dates back to the Permian, some 270 million
years ago, indicating that the use of mimesis is an ancient survival mechanism
which has been evolved and used many times in many distinct lineages of insects.
The development of mimesis in insects often results in the mimicry of plant
life. When this happens it exemplifies the close association between insects
and plants; for a lineage to change its body over time to sometimes perfectly
match the appearance of another organism is truly fascinating, as the insect
then relies on its chosen template for its survival. This is a precarious
specialism to have, as you depend upon the presence of your chosen plant to
stay hidden, and if that plant changes or disappears you must adapt to the
changes or die. Despite the risks it is a hugely successful strategy, which has
even made its way into the fossil record on a number of occasions.
Figure 2. A Timeline of Mimesis in Insects. This diagram shows the key events applicable to the evolution of mimesis in insects on a geological timescale. By Julian Kiely. |
So Where Did It All Begin?
It is possible
that mimesis first evolved within animals during the Cambrian, and possibly
coincided with the origin of the first complex visual systems (Vinther, 2019).
However, these early mimics wouldn’t have mimicked plants and were not insects,
so for the time being we’ll put them on a shelf for another time. The first
insects evolved during the Late Silurian - Early Devonian and likely originated
in freshwater environments (Benton & Harper, 2009). This initial evolution
was quickly followed by a transition to terrestrial habitats, where insects
diversified quickly in a land dominated by early vascular plants, and towards
the end of the Devonian the first forests. While it is possible that some forms
of mimesis were present in Devonian and Carboniferous insects, there is no
evidence for it, and even the presence of disruptive colouration is rare at
this time (Garrouste et al, 2016).
Currently the
earliest record we have of plant mimesis in insects comes from the Middle
Permian Cians Formation of France. Here we find the insect Permotettigonia gallica (Garrouste et al, 2016); an extinct relative of today’s bush crickets (Tettigoniidae;
see Figure 6. for a modern example). It is known from a single tegmina (the name
given to the hardened forewing of a cricket) which is rather broad and leaf
shaped, and has a venation pattern similar to the vein structure on the leaves
of Taeniopteris (Figure 1.). While Taeniopteris is not known from the Cians
Formation (which does not preserve plant remains), it is known from other
similarly aged formations, and specimens have also been found with feeding
traces (Figure 1.) attributed to orthopteroid
insects (Beck & Labandeira, 1998 ;Galtier & Broutin, 2008; Garrouste et al, 2016). Thus P. gallica was most likely mimicking
the leaves of Taeniopteris or a
similar plant.
Welcome, to
Jurassic Park Plants!!!
The appearance
of mimesis during the Permian was possibly due to the continued evolution of
small insectivorous arboreal and gliding vertebrates, which began replacing the
earlier aerial insect hunters (Evans, 1987; Garrouste et al, 2016). At the end of the Permian, the world was ravaged by
the largest mass extinction of all time; many lineages of animal were wiped out
during this extinction, leaving a void which was quickly filled by many weird
new groups (interestingly, plants do not seem to have been affected as much as
the animals by this extinction event, and most lineages survived into the
Mesozoic; Nowak, Schneedeli-Hermann & Kustatscher, 2019). Among these were
several arboreal groups and the first true flying vertebrates (Witton, 2013;
Witton, 2017). It is likely that this increase in aerial predators would have
driven the evolution of more widespread mimesis (and other forms of crypsis for
that matter) in insects; however, this is just a speculation as we have yet to
find evidence of mimesis from Triassic or Early Jurassic insects.
The next
occurrence of mimesis in a fossil insect comes from the upper Middle Jurassic
Jiulongshan formation of Inner Mongolia. Here we find an almost perfect memetic
association between a species of hangingfly, Juracimbrophlebia
ginkgofolia, and the
ginkgoale Yimaia capituliformis (Wang
et al, 2012; see Figure 2.). Yimaia
was an ancient relative of the modern maidenhair tree (Ginkgo biloba) and possessed leaves which were similar to Ginkgo. However, instead of being flabellate
or bilobate as in its modern relative, the leaves of Yimaia could have up to 6 lobes, which were often long and highly
divided to almost the leaf base. While the growth habit of Yimaia is not known, it can be presumed that it would have formed
trees in a similar manner to Ginkgo,
and would have been part of a warm-temperate or sub-tropical forest community
(Wang et al, 2006). This forest
system was inhabited by an incredible diversity of animals and plants, so it’s
not surprising that we have evidence of mimesis here. J. ginkgofolia is a member of an extinct group of hangingflies
called Cimbrophlebiidae, and like their modern relatives these flies were long
boded, long legged ambush predators, which used their outstretched forelegs to
hang from leaves or branches, waiting for their prey to fly or crawl by. Leaf
mimicry would thus have been a useful advantage for J. ginkgofolia, allowing it to avoid detection by both predators
and prey. It is thought that J.
ginkgofolia displayed mimesis because its long wings and abdomen closely
resemble the leaves of Y. capituliformis in
size and shape when outstretched (see Figure 3.). The leaves of modern Ginkgo are often pendulous, hanging
below the branch, and it is possible that Yimaia
leaves also grew in this way, which would have further allowed these
hangingflies to blend in with them. Similar associations are also suspected
among other cimbrophlebiids, so it is possible that leaf mimesis is a common
feature among this group. It is also thought that this association between J. ginkgofolia and Y. capituliformis may have also been a mutualistic one; while
herbivory rates in the modern Ginkgo
are rather low, many examples of insect herbivory are known from the leaves of Yimaia. A mutualistic relationship may
have evolved, with the leaves of Y.
capituliformis providing cover for J.
ginkgofolia, while it protected the leaves by eating the insects which they
attracted.
Lacewing Larvae and Liverworts.
Among modern
insects, there is an order called Neuroptera (the lacewings, mantidflies and
scorpion flies) which have developed an interesting form of camouflage in their
larvae; in some species, the larvae grow long hair or net like projections, called
tubular tubercles, from their backs, which they use to carry various forms of
debris around as camouflage. This behaviour is often species specific, with
certain species specialising in carrying different things, be it the
exoskeletons of their deceased prey, or pieces of leaf litter and lichen. This
debris-carrying behaviour is most common among the larvae of the Green
Lacewings (family Chrysopoidae), where their carnivorous young utilise this
camouflage to remain hidden from predators and their prey (which they capture
with long pincer-like jaws; see Figure 4.E). While this is not strictly
speaking mimesis, I thought this interesting feature would be worthy of
mention, especially since it has a reasonable Mesozoic fossil record (Pérez-de
la Fuente et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2016; Pérez-de la Fuente et al, 2016). The earliest examples of
debris-carrying are known from inclusions within Lebanese amber, which shows
that this feature was already fully developed by the Early Cretaceous. Other Cretaceous
amber deposits from around the world (French, Spanish and Myanmar amber) also
preserve examples of this feature, supporting an ancient origin of this
specialisation among this group (Wang et al,
2016). One particularly well know species, from the El Soplao amber of Spain,
is Hallucinochrysa diogenesi (Pérez-de
la Fuente et al, 2012; Pérez-de la Fuente et al, 2016); it is small, with a
body less than 1 cm long, and is thought to be in its third instar (i.e. it has
shed its exoskeleton three times). The exceptional preservation of this
specimen allowed for the detailed study of its tubular tubercles, which show an
alternating branching structure with a dichotomising tip.
Based on this
wealth of fossil evidence, and its widespread distribution in modern species,
it is thought that debris-carrying in lacewing larvae is an ancestral
specialisation, which was subsequently lost in several lineages. One example of
this in the fossil record is rather interesting, as it shows a transition from
self-decoration crypsis to mimesis. The lacewing in question is Phyllochrysa huangi (Liu et al, 2018; Figure 4. A, D), which is
known from the earliest Late Cretaceous Myanmar amber deposits. What I find
most interesting about this species is that while most insects mimic vascular
plants such as gymnosperms and angiosperms, P.
huangi appeared to mimic a liverwort, a nonvascular plant (Figure 4. B, C)!
It is small, being about 6mm long, and has large flat flanges, called foliate
plates, extending from each of its body segments. These become increasingly
smaller towards the posterior of the body and share some distinct similarities
to several species of leafy liverwort identified from the same amber deposits
(however, I have a sneaky suspicion that some of these ‘liverworts’ might be species
of Selaginella – see Figure 4. F, G,
H). The environment which P. huangi inhabited
was a warm, humid, tropical island during the Late Cretaceous, and thus both
liverworts and Selaginella would have
grown amongst the damp leaf litter of the forest floor, where P. huangi hunted for its invertebrate
prey.
Figure 4. Crypsis in early Late Cretaceous Chrysopoid larvae. A. Phyllochrysa huangi, a mimetic green lacewing larva. B. Model Liverwort for P. huangi mimesis, based on specimen PB227126 (life reconstruction). C. Liverwort in amber (specimen PB227126). D. Phyllochrysa huangi in amber (Holotype NIGP167955). E. Generic Chrysopoid larva, displaying debris-carrying camouflage. F. ‘Liverwort’ (Selaginella?) in amber (specimen PB22709) – note the heterophyllous leaves and single central vein to each leaf, features characteristic of Selaginella (pers. comm. T. Slippey, 30/03/2019). G. ‘Liverwort’ (Selaginella?) in amber (specimen PB22710) – note the heterophyllous leaves and single central vein to each leaf, features characteristic of Selaginella(pers. comm. T. Slippey, 30/03/2019). H. Modern Selaginella kraussiana for comparison (photographed at The National Botanic Gardens of Ireland). Scale Bars 1 mm – all images to scale. A, B, E & H by Julian Kiely. C, D, F & G taken from Liu et al 2018. |
Stick Around for More Mimesis.
Possibly the
most enigmatic group of modern mimetic insects are the stick and leaf insects (Phasmatodea);
this family has an almost global modern distribution and contains an incredible
diversity of species, with most possessing camouflage to mimic various plant
organs such as leaves, stems, twigs and bark. In many modern species, their
mimesis also extends to their eggs, which can often mimic seeds (Martill,
Bechly & Loveridge, 2007) While their fossil record is generally
fragmentary, we have evidence for the presence of stem-phasmatods throughout
most of the Mesozoic (from as far back as at least the Early Jurassic);
however, the taxonomic relationship of these Mesozoic species to crown-group Phasmatodea
is still uncertain, and many likely lie outside of the crown group.
To cover all
known species of stem and crown Phasmatodea fossils is well beyond the scope of
this blog, so instead I will focus on two particularly well preserved examples,
which clearly display adaptations for mimesis. The first species I will cover
is Cretophasmomia melanogramma (Wang et al, 2014; Figure 5. A), which hails
from the famous Yixian Formation of Liaoning, China (the same formation which
has yielded a stunning array of fossils, including feathered dinosaurs and some
of the earliest angiosperms). It is known from three beautifully preserved
specimens (two males and one female) which are about 6 cm long and display
large wings and a thin body. The female specimen is slightly larger than the
males, indicating that sexual dimorphism in size was already beginning to
develop within this group. The fossils also preserve some of the original
patterning, showing a dark band running down the body, and darkly pigmented
veins in the otherwise (presumably) translucent wings. When folded these wings
would have produced a series of longitudinal stripes along the body which have
been likened to the venation pattern seen within several Yixian plant species.
One species which bears a particular resemblance to the colour banding of C. melanogramma is Membranifolia admirabilis (Figure 5. D), a morphospecies known only
from leaf-like organs which possibly share affinities with the Ginkgophytes
(although it has also been suggested to be related to the Bennettitales or Gnetales). M. admirabilis organs are dicotomising,
with up to three levels of division, and in life were likely thin and
translucent, with distinctive banding caused by the veins. It is this
similarity which has led us to believe that C.
melanogramma was using M. admirabilis
as a model plant for its mimesis, possibly camouflaging itself among bunches of
this organ to avoid detection from the large diversity of insectivorous birds,
with which it shared its environment. Another stem-phasmatod from the Yixian is
Renphasma sinica (Nel & Delfosse,
2011; Figure 5. B), which was smaller than C.
melanogramma with a broader body and wings. It also preserves a pattern on
the wings, which indicate a pale spotted banding pattern with a lighter
interior to the wing and a darker edge. This likely constituted a form of disruptive
colouration (as opposed to mimesis), where the pale spots imitate the speckling
pattern of light which shines through a forest canopy, allowing it to blend
into the background more.
And finally, now
for the last creature we will take a look at in this blog: Eophyllium messelensis (Wedmann, Bradler & Rust, 2007)! This
insect is part of the modern clade Phylliinae, which are more commonly known as
the leaf insects or ‘walking leaves’, and is from the Messel Formation of
Germany. The single specimen is of a male and measures almost 7 cm long; similarly
to modern leaf insects its abdomen is flattened and expanded into a broad
leaf-like shape similar to many modern broadleaf plants (see Figure 5. C).
Messel was an early Eocene tropical forest, surrounding a lake filled Maar,
which contained a wide diversity of primarily angiosperm plants. By this
period, the dinosaurs had already become extinct, and instead, the forest was
dominated by a fauna of animals not too dissimilar from our current tropics.
Many small mammals, including early horses, bats and primates, inhabited this
forest, and the canopy would have been filled with a stunning variety of birds.
This abundance of potential predators would have made staying hidden a
difficult and unending task for E.
messelensis. However, like its modern relatives, E. messelensis likely had a trick up its sleeve, to help it stay
hidden. In modern leaf insects, their mimicry of plants is not simply restricted
to their morphology, but also extends to their behaviour; when not remaining
still, modern leaf insects often make random jerky movements with their body,
and whenever they walk they move in a similar jerky fashion which mimics the
movement of leaves as they are disturbed by the currents in the air. It is
likely that E. messelensis
implemented a similar behaviour, allowing it to complete its mimesis more
completely than if it simply stayed still (Smith, Schaal & Habersetzer,
2018).
Well now, it
seems we have come to the end of another blog post. This was a very interesting
topic to research and has greatly increased my appreciation for these
fascinating fossil insects, and the plants which they mimic. It has also
increased my appreciation for their many modern counterparts and has revealed
to me how complex an adaptation mimesis truly is. We have seen insects which
mimic leaves and other plant organs in both their behaviour and appearance,
revealed the complex associations which these plants and animals maintain, and
have even taken a look at the possible causes of such extreme evolution! The
natural world is truly wonderful and I hope you have enjoyed learning about it.
I have barely begun to scratch the surface, so I hope you stay tuned for all
the blog posts yet to come!
Thank-you and
All the Best,
Julian Kiely
Figure 6. An example of a modern mimetic insect, a Phaneropterine Katydid (Tettigoniidae; subfamily Phaneropterinae) from Indonesia. Photographed by Franz Anthony (© Franz Anthony). If you’d like to see more photography and artwork by Franz, please visit his website, and follow him on Twitter. He posts some amazing stuff, so I would highly recommend following him! |
References
- Beck, A. L., Labandeira, C. C. (1998). Early Permian insect folivory on a gigantopterid-dominated
riparian flora from north-central Texas. Palaeoecology,
vol. 142, pp. 139 – 173
- Beentji, H. (2016). The Kew Plant Glossary: an illustrated
dictionary of plant terms. Second Edition. Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic
Gardens, Kew.
- Benton, M. J., Harper, D. A. T. (2009). Introduction to Paleobiology and the
Fossil Record. 96000 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
- Bulanov, V. V., Sennikov, A. G. (2015). Substantiation of Validity of the Late
Permian Genus Weigeltisaurus Kuhn,
1939 (Reptilia, Weigeltisauridae). Palaeontological
Journal, vol. 49, iss. 10, pp. 1101 – 1111, doi: 10.1134/S0031030115110039
- Engel, M. S., Grimaldi, D. A. (2004). New light shed on the oldest insect. Nature, vol. 427, pp. 627 – 630
- Evans, S. E. (1987). A review of the Upper Permian genera Coelurosauravus, Weigeltisaurus and Gracilisaurus
(Reptilia: Diapsida). Zoological Journal
of the Linnean Society, vol. 90, pp. 275 – 303
- Galtier, J., Broutin, J. (2008). Floras from red beds of the Permian
Basin of Lodève (Southern France).
Journal of Iberian Geology, vol. 34, iss. 1, pp. 57 – 72
- Garrouste, R., Hugel, S., Jacquelin, L., Rostan,
P., Steyer, J. S., Desutter-Grandcolas, L., Nel, A. (2016). Insect mimicry of plants dates back to
the Permian. Nature Communications, vol.
7, article 13735 (2016), doi: 10.1038/ncomms13735
- Liu, X., Shi, G., Xia, F., Lu, X., Wang,
B., Engel, M. S. (2018).
Liverwort Mimesis in a Cretaceous Lacewing Larva. Currentl biology, vol. 28, pp. 1475 – 1481, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.060
- Martill, D. M., Bechly, G., Loveridge, R.
F. (2005). The Crato
Fossil Beds of Brazil: Window into an Ancient World. The Edinburgh Building,
Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Morgan, S. (2013). The Illustrated Encyclopaedia of
Butterflies & Moths: A natural history and identification guide to the most
significant species, including swallowtails, hairstreaks, yellows,
fritillaries, blues, skippers and tiger moths. Anness Publishing Ltd, Blaby
Road, Wigston, LeicestershireLE18 4SE: Lorenz Books
- Nel, A., Delfosse, E. (2011). A new Chinese Mesozoic stick insect. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, vol. 56,
pp. 429 – 432
- Nowak, H., Schneedeli-Hermann, E., Kustatscher,
E. (2019). No mass
extinction for land plants at the Permian–Triassic transition. Nature Communications, vol. 10, article
384 (2019), doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07945-w
- Parry, S. F., Noble, S. R., Crowley, Q.
G., Wellman, C. H. (2011).
A high-precision U–Pb age constraint on the Rhynie Chert Konservat-Lagerstätte:
time scale and other implications. Journal
of the Geological Society, London, vol. 168, pp. 863 – 872
- Pérez-de la Fuente, R., Delclòs, X., Peñalver,
E., Speranza, M., Wierzchos, J., Ascaso, C., Engel, M. S. (2012). Early evolution and ecology of camouflage
in insects. PNAS, vol. 109, iss. 52,
pp. 21414 – 21419, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213775110
- Perez-de la Fuente, R., Delclòs, X., Peñalver,
E., Engel, M. S. (2016). A
defensive behavior and plant-insect interaction in Early Cretaceous amber – The
case of the immature lacewing Hallucinochrysa diogenesi. Arthropod Structure and Development, vol. 45, iss. 2, pp. 133 –
139, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2015.08.002
- Pteros. Caelestiventus. https://www.pteros.com/pterosaurs/caelestiventus.html
- Rubinstein, C. V., Gerrienne, P., de la
Puente, G. S., Astini, R. A., Steemans, P. (2010). Early Middle Ordovician evidence for land
plants in Argentina (eastern Gondwana). New
Phytologist, vol. 188, pp. 365 – 369, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03433.x
- Shen, B., Dong, L., Xiao, S., Kowalewski,
M. (2008). The Avalon
Explosion: Evolution of Ediacara Morphospace. Science, vol. 319, iss. 5859, pp. 81 – 84, doi: 10.1126/science.1150279
- Smith, K. T., Schaal, S. F. K.,
Habersettzer, J. (2018).
Messel: An Ancient Greenhouse Ecosystem. E. Schweizerbart’sche
Verlagsbuchhandlung (Nägele u. Obermiller), Stuttgart, Germany. Prof. Dr. Dr.
h. c. Volker Mosbrugger, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung,
Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
- Stein, W. E., Mannolini,
F., VanAller Hernick, L., Landing, E., Berry, C. M. (2007). Giant cladoxylopsid trees resolve the
enigma of the Earth’s earliest forest stumps at Gilboa. Nature, vol. 446, pp. 904 – 907, doi: 10.1038/nature05705
- Turek, V., Manda, S. (2011). Colour pattern polymorphism in Silurian
nautiloid Phragmoceras Broderip,
1839. Bulletin of Geosciences, vol.
86, pp. 91–105
- Vinther, J. (2019). Palaeocolour and the evolution of vision
and predation in the last 500 million years. Oral lecture given at the Oxford
Palaeontology Symposium, Oxford High School, Belbroughton Road, Oxford, 16th
March 2019.
- Wang, Y., Labandeira, C. C., Shih, C., Ding,
Q., Wang, C., Zhao, Y., Ren, D. (2012). Jurassic mimicry between a hangingfly and a ginkgo from
China. PNAS, vol. 109, iss. 50, pp.
20514 – 20519, doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205517109
- Wang, B., Xia, F., Engel, M. S., Perrichot,
V., Shi, G., Zhang, H., Chen, J., Jarzembowski, E., A., Wappler, T., Rust, J.
(2016). Debris-carrying
camouflage among diverse lineages of Cretaceous insects. Science Advances, vol. 2, iss. 6, article 1501918, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501918
- Witton, M. P. (2013). Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution
Anatomy. 6 Oxford Street, Woodstock, Oxfordshire OX20 1TW: Princeton University
Press
- Witton, M. P. (2017). Recreating an Age of Reptiles. Ramsbury,
Marlborough, Wiltshire SN82HR: The Crowood Press Ltd
This is great! I really love how in-depth and insightful it is, and it's so refreshing to see flora and invertebrate fauna given the coverage they deserve. One small point- you referred to the "infamous Yixian formation" but isn't it just famous? I don't think it has any kind of bad rep
ReplyDelete